About Tobias Taylor

Tobias Taylor is a Director and Wealth Management Adviser at Jarden, New Zealand’s leading investment and advisory firm. He has worked in banking and financial services for more than 20 years in London, Wellington and Hawke’s Bay. Tobias is a board member of Presbyterian Support East Coast. He is a NZX Adviser, Certified Financial Planner (CFP), a member of Financial Advice New Zealand (FANZ) and the New Zealand Institute of Directors (IoD). Find out more about Jarden’s Hawke’s Bay team here - https://www.jarden.co.nz/our-services/wealth-management/

What the ‘everything rally’ did to markets in 2023

The investment market in 2023 was strong – unlike the year prior – largely thanks to an impactful December quarter. It’s a great example of the need for patience and a reminder of the importance of a long-term view when investing.

The positive returns were driven by what we’re calling the “everything rally” – a perfect storm of equities rallying and debt securities (bonds) more than reversing the losses recorded in the previous quarter.

The rally began in November when inflation fell faster than expected and spurred hopes of central banks cutting interest rates in most major economies. This saw recession fears replaced with growing confidence that central banks will achieve their inflation targets without tipping economies into recession.

In December, that confidence was boosted by the US Federal Reserve changing its outlook to include three forecast interest rate cuts in 2024. This fanned investors’ expectations of deeper and faster cuts, which led to higher equity prices.

Equities responded strongly to the news

Equity markets finished the year on a high note, with global equities producing a quarterly gain of +5.4% in New Zealand dollar terms, driven largely by the US equity market finishing just shy of an all-time high. While the “Magnificent Seven” (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla) produced most of the US equity market gains in 2023, the rally broadened to the rest of the market in the December quarter. You can see this when you look at the tech-dominated NASDAQ Index – up +14.3% and the broader S&P 500 Index’s gain of +11.2% – both in the December quarter.

Elsewhere, equity market returns were more modest at around +2 to +6% returns over the quarter. And closer to home, the Australian equity market produced a strong +8.9% gain in New Zealand dollars, while the New Zealand equity market was more subdued at +2.7%.

Debt securities join the rally.

Before the December quarter, it looked like 2023 would be another ho hum year for investors in New Zealand bonds. But the December quarter delivered strong returns.

Better New Zealand bond returns were attributed to growing optimism that inflation was cooling, and interest rates would soon be lowered. As a result, there was increased demand for bonds, which drove prices up and saw interest rates fall. As a result of the 5.0% quarterly gain, NZ bonds avoided a third straight year of losses, producing a +7.5% annual return.

This in many ways restored value in bonds that was challenged in 2022.

Looking forward in 2024

Globally, economic activity is likely to slow but we see recession being avoided in 2024. While key economic uncertainties remain, severe economic outcomes look less likely than in 2023. After a year to forget in 2022, last year was a lot better for New Zealand bond returns.

We expect New Zealand’s longer-term interest rates to decline, echoing our expectations of global rates. This increases the attractiveness of New Zealand bonds as falling interest rates increase their capital value. On balance, the evidence suggests relatively balanced risks around global equities, which supports a neutral exposure to this asset class.

Investment implications

The 11th-hour rally of the markets to the end of 2023 will have restored the faith of many investors in the markets. That said, for 2024 investors should continue with a disciplined approach to diversified asset allocation in quality assets to ensure they make the most out of having a balanced portfolio.

Note: This article was written on 15 Jan 2024.

Tobias Taylor is Director, Wealth Management Adviser at Jarden. This research has been prepared by Jarden Securities Limited (Jarden) which holds a licence issued by the Financial Markets Authority to provide a financial advice service. The information in this research solely relates to the companies and investment opportunities specified within. The nature and scope of any financial advice included within that research are limited to generic and non-personalised commentary about that investment only, such as the performance and the investment outlook of the company concerned. Any such commentary does
not take into account any individual’s particular financial situation, objectives, goals or appetite for risk. We recommend that you seek financial advice that is specific to your personal circumstances before making any investment decision or taking any action. No fees, expenses, or other amounts will be payable for the provision of any financial advice in this research report. However, if you act on any information or advice contained in this research report, a brokerage fee (and other fees such as an administration and custody fee) may be payable to Jarden. For fees payable for brokerage and other services provided by Jarden, information on our complaints and dispute resolution process, and the duties applicable to us for providing financial advice, please see our publicly available disclosure statement at https://www.jarden.co.nz/our-services/wealth-management/financial-advice-provider-disclosure-statement

Semiconductors: The AI beneficiary

Artificial Intelligence, or AI, is a global fixation – one that has driven the Nasdaq to outperform every other major world equity index this year.

AI is having its moment, and a knock-on effect of its popularity is that semiconductor companies have reemerged in the spotlight as one of AI’s crucial initial beneficiaries.

Semiconductors are the elements that conduct electricity voltages between that of typical conductors and insulators. These electrification properties enable semiconductors to be used in computers and other electronics to control the flow of electricity, store memory and convert energy.

This isn’t the first time semiconductors have been popularised recently. Pandemic supply constraints and lifestyle adjustments like working from home drove demand in the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, but there was a brief period of quiet where they weren’t performing as well.

The factors that caused this initial demand have not gone away, but the demand for AI is eclipsing any other driver of semiconductor use.

So, the Nasdaq is benefiting from this upward swing, but why exactly are semiconductor companies benefiting so much from the AI boom?

Chips – Logic and memory:

To understand why semiconductors are benefiting from AI’s popularity,
it’s important to understand the role the materials have played in the advancement of technology. Computer chips are made from semiconductors and are used for calculating and storing data.

In order for AI to function, it too relies on the use of chips. The two major types of chips are logic and memory.

Logic chips, sometimes referred to as microprocessors, are the ‘brains’ of electronic devices. In this context, logic implies ‘processing’, and the chips perform instructions and tasks that the device needs to execute. Every electronic device needs a storage unit, and memory chips serve this purpose.

The process of manufacturing semiconductor chips is one of the most complex engineering and scientific feats that humans have achieved. To the untrained eye, this process seems like pure magic.

The process begins with the design of the chip, where engineers use complex software to design the circuit of transistors. Post design completion, the blueprint is sent to a foundry (a metal castings factory) for manufacturing. The ‘magic’ of semiconductors lies in their ability to scale and continually get smaller over time.

In 1965, businessman and engineer Gordon Moore proposed that the number of components on a semiconductor would double every year.

In 1975 he revised his forecast that the rate would double every two years. Since then, his prediction held, and has widely become known as Moore’s law. Some manufacturers have made their chips smaller and more efficient than others. In the world of chips, the leading-edge is a term used to describe the smallest and fastest chips produced.

Companies with the highest profit margins are the leaders of the leading-edge space, as they have access to large capital investment that in turn funds research and development costs. As the number and type of devices worldwide seems to exponentially grow, so does demand for these chips. Data centre servers, smartphones and other advanced computing devices account for a large amount of this increased demand.

AI is the newest driver of this demand.

Chip hungry Artificial Intelligence:

Artificial Intelligence models including OpenAI’s ChatGPT require vast amounts of computation, memory, and data to run.

Having always experienced high demand, leading-edge chips regularly eclipse analyst estimates. Leading-edge graphics processing units (GPUs) are used to train the world’s most advanced AI models, and as AI has developed at a significant speed, so has the demand for GPUs. The newest generation of chips are more economical than previous generations, meaning training these models is more efficient per dollar spent.

For AI to operate effectively it needs to run off chips that are efficient and economically viable. For investors looking for semiconductor-related investments they can look towards companies that are tied to leading-edge semiconductors.

This includes Nvidia and AMD in chip design, ASML and KLA Corp who provide machines that measure chips, and TSMC which manufactures chips as a contract manufacturer. Predictions for the future of the semiconductor industry are bright, with McKinsey and Company assessing a trillion-dollar valuation for the industry by 2030.

Of all the recent winners that have emerged from the AI boom – tech giants, cloud titans, even cyber-criminals – chipmakers may just be the biggest.

Tobias Taylor is Director, Wealth Management Adviser at Jarden.

The information and commentary in this article are provided for general information purposes only. It reflects views and research available at the time of publication, using external sources, systems and other data and information we believe to be accurate, complete and reliable at the time of preparation. We make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, correctness and completeness of that information, and will not be liable or responsible for any error or omission. It is not to be relied upon as a basis for making any investment decision. Please seek specific investment advice before making any investment decision or taking any action. Jarden Securities Limited is an NZX Firm. A financial advice provider disclosure statement is available free of charge at https://www.jarden.co.nz/our-services/wealth-management/financial-advice-provider-disclosure-statement

A closer look at Carbon

At times of market and economic uncertainty, combined with relatively low expected returns for many asset classes, we should consider more widely the assets we hold.

It’s important to have a portfolio strategy, designed with discipline, embracing market opportunities while preparing for the unexpected. There are several components of a well-constructed portfolio, including a robust strategic asset allocation that’s consistent with your long-term goals and objectives. A mix of asset classes and strategies all have a role to play. In more recent times, we’ve been challenged to look beyond traditional alternative asset allocations like gold, silver, commoditised debt and emerging markets (amongst others).

This is where carbon has a role to play. Growth in carbon markets may have wide-ranging implications for climate finance, corporate strategy, and global trade. Now when constructing a portfolio for retail investors, carbon can be a serious consideration. It is our view that the New Zealand carbon market was surprised last year when the Government rejected the Climate Change Commission’s (CCC) advice to reduce the number of NZUs up for auction and raise the price settings.

We understand the rationale for the CCC’s recommendations may have been that it wanted to reduce what is perceived as excess supply in the system. In short, it looked to raise the auction floor price, reduce the number of NZUs auctioned and move the Cost Containment Reserve (CCR) much higher than present levels. The CCR is the price level where the Government will sell more NZUs if demand exceeds the regular auction supply.The Government considered the recommendation was likely too inflationary as our petrol, electricity use and landfill trips all have a carbon cost embedded into them.

Given the NZU market had seen the CCR as a magnet previously and both CCRs were fully used in the 2021 and 2022 auctions, it was concerned carbon prices would jump too high on the CCC recommendations. The Government decided to keep with the current plan of the CCR being $80.64 in 2023 and to rise it incrementally to $129.97 by 2027.

The market underwent a significant correction on that announcement – one of the biggest seen in its fifteen-year history, falling $20 or 25% from a high of $88 to the current price of $67. So where to from here for prices? There are two questions. What will the Government do next, and then where do prices go from here?

Whether you agree with the Government’s view or not is somewhat irrelevant. NZUs have been deflationary since the announcement, and whilst we need higher carbon prices – not lower to decarbonise – the ETS is a market where prices will change, both up and down. Regulatory risk is the fundamental risk you assume if you trade in the ETS.

The reality is that domestic and international targets remain. It’s just become harder to achieve. Unless we start making emission reductions now, carbon credits on the ETS become shorter in supply. The ETS covers roughly half of our emissions – circa 40 million tonnes per year. That’s approximately the amount of NZUs that need to be surrendered by liable entities in our ETS every year. Some liable entities are fuel companies, coal and gas users and electricity companies.

They collect the carbon from us in cash, buy NZUs in the market or at auction, and hand them to the Government every year. 1 NZU equals 1 tonne of CO2e emissions. Looking at the following table, you can see if emissions remain flat and the government supply falls from 2023 to 2027 through auctioning, the market will be short 45 million tonnes in 2027 if the CCR is taken out every year, and 85 million tonnes in 2027 if it is not.

Source – CCC and Jarden This means that the shortfall will have to come from actual emission reductions, such as forestry or the current registry stockpile. All these (extra) NZUs sit in the hands of private actors. We know some will come to market, but we don’t know how much. What is required is approximately 10 to 20 million NZUs per year for supply to equal demand – we’re not sure that is achievable. Carbon prices may be impacted.

Tobias Taylor is Director, Wealth Management Adviser at Jarden. The information and commentary in this article are provided for general information purposes only. It reflects views and research available at the time of publication, using external sources, systems and other data and information we believe to be accurate, complete and reliable at the time of preparation. We make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, correctness and completeness of that information, and will not be liable or responsible for any error or omission. It is not to be relied upon as a basis for making any investment decision. Please seek specific investment advice before making any investment decision or taking any action. Jarden Securities Limited is an NZX Firm. A financial advice provider disclosure statement is available free of charge at https://www.jarden.co.nz/our-services/wealth-management/financial-advice-provider-disclosure-statement

Looking ahead: The pandemic’s economic ripples

The pandemic and the recent relaxation of restrictions continue to reverberate through the global economy and cloud the outlook. For insight into what may lie ahead, Jarden investment strategist and economist John Carran shared his thoughts, at the time of writing on 18 November 2022.

Through the haze, we see potential improvements in inflation but also see the global economy flirting with recession. In this environment, financial markets may waver in the near-term. Longer-term, prospects for share markets and bonds still look promising. The most glaring consequence of the pandemic, and the responses to it of governments and central banks, has been rapidly rising prices.

Clogged supply chains and the war in Ukraine, combined with rampant consumer spending, have caused prices for energy, food, and goods to rocket up globally. Record low interest rates boosted house prices and led to higher housing-related costs. Despite the immediate headwinds for New Zealand’s economy, household finances are in reasonable shape, with many having built their savings over the pandemic.

This could provide some buffer to tougher conditions ahead.  With global supply chain pressures now easing and commodity prices falling, inflationary pressures may soon ease. Cooling housing markets in New Zealand and elsewhere are also expected to gradually moderate inflation. However, prices in consumer services tend to be stickier. Therefore, although total inflation is expected to continue edging down, there will likely be a significant remnant that will linger for longer.

How long high inflation lasts is also likely to be influenced by pressures in the labour market and how fast wages grow. This will impact the pace of consumer spending and the degree to which businesses pass higher wage costs on to their customers. This is a key risk for central banks in their quest to get on top of high inflation. While heated labour markets may cool somewhat in the first half of 2023 as labour market churn settles down, it may take a spell of higher unemployment to settle wage growth to a more sustainable rate. Although there are reasons to expect inflation pressures to ease a little in the near-term, the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) and other central banks are unlikely to slow the pace of interest rate increases this year.

Central banks presently consider the risks of not doing enough to control inflation are worse than the risks of doing too much. However, by mid-2023, we expect many developed economies to show signs of slowing, including labour market cooling, and core inflation shifting down. This will likely be enough for the Fed and other central banks to halt their interest rate rises. Interest rate rises tend to influence economies with a considerable lag, so recent rapid rate increases should take their full effect through 2023. The more central banks raise interest rates in the near-term, the more likely it is that economies will enter recession next year and possibly through to 2024.

Therefore, it’s also possible that the general economic uncertainty, which has caused share and bond market volatility this year, may persist for a while longer. On the other hand, share valuations have materially declined this year, which means the potential return from shares in the longer term could be favourable. With interest rates now higher than they have been for at least a decade, bonds could similarly offer improved investment yields.

In New Zealand, we are facing similar inflationary and economic pressures to many other countries. The coming year could be challenging as recent interest rate rises start to bite. Many people that locked in low interest rates on one- and two-year fixed mortgages will soon be rolling onto much higher rates.

With the local housing market already feeling the effects of higher interest rates on mortgages and house prices falling almost 13 per cent from their peak at the end of last year, New Zealanders’ confidence and ability to spend could be adversely affected. Despite the immediate headwinds for New Zealand’s economy, household finances are in reasonable shape, with many having built their savings over the pandemic. This could provide some buffer to tougher conditions ahead. In this less certain environment, we often work with clients to diversify their investments in a way that meets their goals and timeframes. This can help with navigating the route ahead in a way that suits your individual circumstances.

 

Investing through uncertainty: It’s a matter of time

Equity markets for the year so far can be described in one word: Volatile

The current situation in markets is being driven by rising interest rates, alongside multi-decade high inflation, clogged supply chains and the war in Ukraine.

Times like these can often spark our ‘fight or flight’ instinct, or alternatively investors might avoid any risk altogether. But both scenarios could potentially harm the likelihood of achieving long term investment goals. It highlights the importance of having an investment plan to guide your decision making.

The length of time you look to hold your investments – the ‘time horizon’ – is important, because the approach you take when investing for the long-term may differ to that over a shorter period. This is all dependent on an investor’s unique risk tolerance, investment goals and needs, which are key for investors to clarify from the outset.

Investment returns

Does time really heal everything?

A longer timeline generally means an investor has greater capacity to take on risk, with the ability to withstand short-term drops in value. This allows a plan to be created for a well-constructed, diversified portfolio, which would usually contain a mix of asset classes (e.g., equities/shares, fixed income/bonds, cash) with different levels of investment risk and return.

When assessing an investment risk profile, there are a few key areas we regularly discuss with clients at Jarden; the amount of investable assets available, any cashflow demands, and their investment time horizon. This period ends when they need to draw down capital from their investment portfolio. It’s also important to think about the level of risk an investor is comfortable taking on, as well as any prior investment experience.

In periods of volatility, seeing a real-time decline in your portfolio’s value can be painful. However, conditions change, and any sudden reactions could result in losing potential future gains. Looking at the US equity market daily returns (excluding dividends) from 1927 to 2021, an investor who stayed in the market for all days would have made a 6.1 per cent capital gain (per annum), while those who missed the 25 best days made only 3.5 per cent.

By staying in the markets for longer periods, there is enough time to see them turn.


Our wealth research team analysed rolling returns from a sample “Balanced” portfolio (60% growth assets and 40% income assets) classified as medium risk from 1992-2020.  It showed over shorter periods of time, the portfolio was exposed to higher risks of negative returns. But over longer periods of time, the portfolio had historically produced positive annual returns on average.

Occasional changes to a portfolio – aligned with investment goals – can be beneficial. However, making decisions in reaction to current events can carry a greater risk of not meeting your aims, and create stress.

The next time an investor thinks about altering their portfolio, they should consider whether today’s situation impacts how their overall investments align with their objectives, or if their goals have changed. Often, it can be best to stay put.

This research has been prepared by Jarden Securities Limited (Jarden) which holds a licence issued by the Financial Markets Authority to provide a financial advice service. The information in this research solely relates to the companies and investment opportunities specified within. The nature and scope of any financial advice included within that research is limited to generic and non-personalised commentary about that investment only, such as the performance and the investment outlook of the company concerned. Any such commentary does not take into account any individual’s particular financial situation, objectives, goals or appetite for risk. We recommend that you seek financial advice that is specific to your personal circumstances before making any investment decision or taking any action. No fees, expenses, or other amounts will be payable for the provision of any financial advice in this research report. However, if you act on any information or advice contained in this research report, a brokerage fee (and other fees such as an administration and custody fee) may be payable to Jarden. For fees payable for brokerage and other services provided by Jarden, information on our complaints and dispute resolution process, and the duties applicable to us for providing financial advice, please see our publicly available disclosure statement at https://www.jarden.co.nz/our-services/wealth-management/financial-advice-provider-disclosure-statement

Get your investments right from the start

This article was written in early May.

In the last issue of the Profit, I used the term “market correction”, and boy oh boy, did we have one of those! Not for a second am I claiming a prediction of Covid-19 and the effect on the markets, but I will state that now more than ever real relationships with our clients are paramount.  Also, it’s important to do your homework on your investments before black swan events take place; we’ve now had two in the last 15 years.

But before we talk about that, let me say that I really feel for the businesses of Hawke’s Bay, many owned and operated by people whom I know personally, and the impact that Covid-19 is having.  New Zealand and to an extent Hawke’s Bay, as primary producing economies, will feel the effects of Covid-19 for some time to come.  Stimulus packages have tried to target employment retention and cash flow concerns but the real economy, effectively the flow of non-monetary factors, will struggle to get back to full pace in a short time.  I feel the real effects of Covid-19 are yet to be realised.

Thankfully, at Midlands our relatively vanilla offering to our conservative investors means that we have not experienced the volatility of other sectors – our strength is based on the quality of our lending book and the liquidity and management practices we have in place.  Sure, we’ve had to work with some borrowers regarding their debt serving abilities, but so far this has been done without any material adverse effect on the performance of the fund.  Being diversified around the country and having low Lending to Value Ratios (LVRs) has helped that profile.

Investors trust Midlands to give them a consistent and conservative return, over and above main bank rates.  They do not invest with Midlands with the intention of significant volatility.  But volatility is what investors got in many other sectors, including multi-sector solutions such as KiwiSaver.

I have written at length in the past about factors such as liquidity, volatility and getting an asset allocation that meets your needs and goals when looking to invest.  There is considerable material available in investment documents, such as Product Disclosure Statements (PDS), that assist in making these decisions. Your total asset allocation (all your investments) should be based on your needs, not just in fair weather, but over time and reviewed accordingly.  Past returns should be balanced with defensive factors, diversification of assets, when and if income is distributed etc.

So, I read with bemusement (and great worry) that many KiwiSaver investors switched to conservative or income funds when Covid-19 had violent effects on the market, mainly in late March and early April.  There is enough literature to say that financial professionals cannot time markets effectively, let alone the layman. So why do it? If you do not trust the manager of your funds to navigate what they can within their investment mandates, I would suggest you have chosen the wrong manager. Already we have seen markets correct back considerably meaning that those who switched have crystallised losses and have missed the considerable “bounce”.

I fear that Gen X and Gen Y will bear the main burden of the fiscal stimulus packages of Covid-19 for years to come, via taxation, estate duties (from the boomer generation), means testing of superannuation and many other vehicles yet to materialise. They should not be burning their long term nest eggs with poor investment and asset allocation decisions as well.

There are many factors that determine what you should invest in, especially in KiwiSaver as a “long” investment.  But time is one of the most vital considerations.  If you do not have the stomach for volatility, nor the time, then a more balanced or conservative type fund is more appropriate from the outset, not after the fact.

Looking ahead – what will change

What are your predictions?

I can hardly claim this is a prediction, because it is well documented. But certainly, in the immediate term, we will continue to live in a low interest rate environment. For borrowers, this is good news. However, for savers and investors in income assets, it’s not so great.

One aspect of this is not fully understood. Post KiwiSaver, main street banks do not have to compete for the term deposit billboard rate as much as they used to. This is because within their own KiwiSaver products, they can assign the income end of the portfolios to their own instruments.
This effectively helps fund their domestic loan book by stealth, while charging a management fee to do so. When the organisation then sells you this as an investment solution, this is called “vertical integration”.

So better deposit rates at the bank billboard are a long way off. Time to think differently!

What’s likely to change in your sector?

More regulation and more compliance. On the lending front, the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA) Amendment Bill is going to have some immediate implications come June 2020.

Here at Midlands, with both investing and lending, we are mature in our adoption of anti-money laundering (AML) considerations, as well as continuous disclosure, transparency, and our focus on good customer outcomes.

These changes mean that financial services providers like Midlands must get “closer” to clients. That requires investment into relationships and the delivering of soft skills if not actually giving financial advice per se. But we have to ask a lot of questions of our clients.

For this reason, I struggle with organisations moving away from genuine local relationship models and with “robo advice” or online lending models. To me, it’s an exploration in protecting margins and revenue without investing into customers and communities. Because we have had a very good run in investment returns, I do feel there are some fair-weather models being rolled out to investors that may be challenged in a market correction.

I also struggle with some passive management models for this same reason. Automated electronic trading based on macro asset allocation, with no micro company research really bothers me. Especially when you consider Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) factors.

But personally, I hope the powers that be do look further into “vertical integration” and if it is delivering better client outcomes. Certainly, the findings of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry in Australia indicate it may not.

What opportunities do you see?

For us at Midlands, it’s pretty easy. Invest in our relationships and educate our investors and borrowers. We have a vanilla offering that suits our conservative investors.

We continue to significantly outperform bank deposit rates, while remaining fully liquid (no lock in of funds). We do this by close management of a quality first ranking security loans book across New Zealand.

While banks have reduced their lending and offer low interest rates to retail investors, we can continue growing as we are. We are proud to be non-bank.

What technology advancements will have an impact on how do business?

During our lending process, while we personally inspect every property we lend against, a lot of the initial discovery due diligence process can be done on-line now. This is important to ensure the quality of our lending book. This is only going to get better.

Regarding investments, the speed to market of online services used to be hamstrung by AML requirements. This gap has closed very quickly, and we are aware of this. Certainly, something we are looking into.

Shock and Orr Reserve Bank head prepared to make big calls

Currently, it is very difficult to speak of anything but the low interest rates affecting savers and investors. At the time of writing1, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand has taken a breather with its September 2019 announcement and left the Official CashRate(OCR)at 1.00%.After the hefty movement of 0.50% “south” on August 7, this is welcomed in most sectors.

The OCR influences the price of borrowing money in New Zealand and provides the Reserve Bank with a means of influencing the level of economic activity and inflation. An OCR is a conventional tool by international standards.2 However, for many, it is seen as a blunt instrument that has far wider consequences. This includes directly affecting deposit rates, especially at main street banks.

Banks use domestically raised capital (term deposits) to help fund their lending book. Therefore, “the spread” between their deposit rates and their lending rates is effectively the margin off which they operate. This revenue, as well as transactional fee and service fee revenue, is the primary source of their well-published profits.

We, therefore, rely on competition in order to be able to shop around for better deals, but as rates remain so low, the main banks are starting to look rather homogenised.

It was widely reported3 recently, that the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) has found a further decline in interest rates on bank term deposits is causing more savers to consider alternative investments.

The financial watchdog said a survey of 195 term-deposit holders in August suggested 43 per cent were likely to invest less in term deposits because of low interest rates. Of those who were considering changing their investment strategy, a quarter were considering shifting savings in search of better returns.

Certainly, in our organisation, we are seeing a steady increase in queries about deposits as investors search for regular income and quality yield, without being locked in. More so than ever, investors and savers are asking questions about quality, liquidity and generally, “what do you do with my money”? I find this heartening, as for me it seems the message is filtering through that yield is important, but quality, management and liquidity are all factors that need to be considered.

Even though there is a search for yield, the preservation of capital is front of mind, as it should be.

The low-interest rate environment is currently forecast to continue, with little sign of an end any time soon. Investors and savers can no longer wait “for things to get better”. Mainly because the outlook is that it won’t, any time soon.

Like an English tabloid paper’s perpetual exploration of tacky metaphors, I read4 with great amusementthat the moniker “shock and Orr” is starting to be used.

Certainly, Reserve Bank Governor Adrian Orr (above) has ingrained himself in the financial services psyche of New Zealand. In a previous profession, I remember clearly learning of “shock and awe” in military doctrine with the words “overwhelming force from the outset” still ingrained in my mind 25 years later. In Mr Orr’s case, this cap certainly fits.

In my opinion, he’s a strong and bold Governor, not only for his large cut of the OCR in September, but also for his continued statements regarding bank conduct and all things economy. I am excited by the fact that we have visible economic leadership in New Zealand. The Reserve Bank Governor should be a “front of office” role. For this, personally, I applaud him.

Therefore, moving forward, we should watch Mr Orr with a deep fascination. He must navigate the country through what is largely uncharted waters. Interest rates are historically low and are forecast to remain so. The OCR is a blunt instrument and the biggest trick in his bag of tricks. I wonder how often he dares to play it.

One thing is for sure, this Governor is probably not offended by the term “shock and Orr”. He may even like it…

Making cents of the market

It is the process of anticipating what could lie ahead, and the creation of methods and processes to help minimise the potential negative effects of future influence… but can you ever truly 100% futureproof a portfolio?

The truth is you can’t completely 100% future-proof any portfolio, because investment involves risk no matter how low, and the future is uncertain. But where we lack a crystal ball in life, we can still set a healthy projection for the future by identifying our personal objectives and re-evaluating our investment mix throughout our lives to make it as resilient to negative influence, as possible.

Over time, we’ll go through several investment lifecycles. Our goals and assets in our thirties will likely vary greatly to when we’re near or post retirement age and there are plenty of factors we need to consider at regular intervals over the years to ensure our investments evolve to reflect our lifestyle, risk profile and assets. We should also re-evaluate as markets fluctuate and threats or opportunities present themselves.

The identification and monitoring of our goals will ideally take into consideration a broad range of potential experiences in relation to what’s happening globally. In doing so we should consider how our future outcomes could be impacted by things like technology, political instability, boom and bust business cycles or environmental factors. We’re not talking fear or panic driven decision making, but mere logical consideration to how these factors may affect our goals. This helps us to work out how we should strategise so it aligns with our expectations.

When analysing our goals, it isn’t all cold numbers and projections. More and more we’re seeing the conscious investor looking into more ethical opportunities. Socially responsible investing acknowledges there’s an emotive side and behavioural biases when it comes to the choices we make in life, and it’s important to consider how this should affect the decisions you make with investing too.

Paying attention to our concerns or stance on certain subjects can help focus us on our journey, as well as the outcome, opening us up to take a more tailored, holistic approach. Our needs might be complex, but that doesn’t mean our investment strategy can’t harmonize with them.

MARKET THREATS AND OPPORTUNITES

When we discuss influences such as threats and opportunities in the market, we are trying to recognise that which we can’t yet see in full and anticipate what that could look like for ourselves. We mentioned political instability and BREXIT offers an example: it was a multifaceted disruption to the market that surprised many with its result. It reinforces the importance of recognising triggers early.

According to Statistics New Zealand “Over a fifth of New Zealand’s investment in the UK at the end of June 2016 was portfolio investment” including KiwiSaver investments. The UK is also mentioned as being 14% of New Zealand’s total investment overseas, which is no small fish by any means.

A political event like this pulls on our emotions and biases. Sterling driven assets are becoming less attractive to some and the current state of political turmoil has pushed spooked investors toward more defensive investments. That’s not to say there’s a rule book for this kind of political instability or how we invest. It depends on our individual aversion to risk, our biases, our asset allocation and our goals.

Using comfortable retirement as our hypothetical goal – a riskier investment might appeal to you if you were still receiving a steady income. But as the years pass by and you get closer to retirement you might feel less comfortable with the risk.

Utilising objectivity, our circumstances and projection as tools, we should be able to determine if it is in our interest to keep a hypothetical investment in the UK or whether to change it out for something more suited to our goals.

The takeaway is – though we might not be able to completely ‘futureproof’ our investments, we can get them close. Just keep in mind that as our circumstances, goals and stance change – our investments will likely need to change with us. Well researched and thought out diversification, with effective asset allocations aligned to your personal goals is the most effective tool we have when trying to protect your investments.

Diversifying more than your portfolio

As many readers will know, as well as being a Hawkes Bay based financial adviser who has been servicing Bay clients for over 10 years, I also have a national role with AdviceFirst. Today, AdviceFirst includes the now rebranded Spicers business and has a strong presence with 15 offices throughout New Zealand.

As part of that amalgamation between Spicers and AdviceFirst, I was appointed into my role as Head of Wealth Management. I am privileged that a national organisation like AdviceFirst allows me to fulfil these responsibilities based from Hawkes Bay. Indeed it seems more and more that Bay based professionals are enjoying roles at a national level and working remotely, even at a senior level.

I have a strong duty of care and managerial responsibility for 35 Wealth Management Advisers across the country. The Profit therefore offers a great platform to discuss another regional and national aspect of duty of care to our respective industries that I feel should be top of mind for all professional disciplines: diversity.

So, I ask, what do you picture when I say financial adviser? You’re probably imagining a male of a particular age – which is often how financial advice has been commercially represented. That’s why securing and nurturing a diverse next generation of financial advisers is a top priority for our industry as we see our ranks of veteran financial advisers naturally decrease.

A knowledge gap is appearing, a gap which we need to fill with the transference of skills and expertise between peers to maintain the high standards for which our vocation is held. It’s our legacy.

AdviceFirst has been working hard to influence and promote diversity within our own organisation, setting a precedent for the next generation of Financial Advisers. Between 2016 and 2018 our percentage of advisers under forty years of age has increased by 13 %.

Along with benchmarking ourselves, building up the ranks of younger advisers, whose development is supported and mentored by our more seasoned financial advisers, is key to ensuring our clients’ needs for quality advice continues to be met competently and practically for years to come.

We’re not just closing the gap on bringing a fresh approach into the industry. Over the past three years we have been working to increase the percentage of female advisers in our business from 18% three years ago, and we have now reached 31% with over 150 years combined industry experience between them. Of course there is more to do, it is important to keep lifting our own standards in this way, nevertheless AdviceFirst is proud to be making good progress to ensure we have more diverse representation.

It’s also important to us that we represent positive change in financial advice and that our efforts mean we are well positioned to advise younger generation x and generation y investors, who are globally set to inherit assets in the trillions from their baby boomer parents (not to mention their own earnings) – and encourage the securing of those assets with accessible and smart financial advice.

We can do this while remaining true to our traditional values and an advice model that is very much relevant to our post war clients. Our clients don’t all have the same needs or background which is why it’s beneficial to work with an Adviser who can understand you and your goals while offering a flexible approach and choice.

As we evolve with social and cultural expectations, we’re building on the foundations that have been expertly set for us by our predecessors. Every time a new and younger generation grows, they bring with them a fresh approach that reflects their era, goals and preferences while remaining stabilised by the experience that helped raise them up.

One example of why we’re pushing for a more diverse offering relates to elderly clients. In this situation there can be a diminished capacity, often due to a passing of a loved one or pressing health concerns. In times of crisis or dealing with difficult decisions about a personal estate or investments, we need to be there for clients. In planning we can offer a level of experience and empathy that is more easily realised and provide our clients with an open and responsive relationship, improving the advice process. Trust is at the core of our value proposition and principles and that trust is better realised with the option for prudential stewardship.

Succession planning isn’t just for investors looking to the future. Succession planning is for all of us, AdviceFirst included. Our journey will continue…