Return of the Brains trust

If there is a silver lining when talking about the global COVID-19 pandemic, it has to be the return to our shores of thousands of highly skilled Kiwis.

For years, New Zealand has been a casualty of what has been termed ‘brain drain’, as highly qualified New Zealanders left in search of opportunities aboard.

Recent figures show that over 50,000 expats have already returned home, with predictions that as many as 500,000 are likely to make their way over the next few years.

What will returning Kiwis encounter on their return to the homeland?

One of the first issues of reverse migration, is likely to be a period in managed isolation and quarantine facilities and the associated cost. Legislation has been passed to enable the Government to recover some of the costs of managed isolation and quarantine facilities for those returning to New Zealand. The COVID-19 Public Health Response and Amendment Bill provides a legal framework to allow the Government to set payment terms, exempt groups of people and waive charges in cases of financial hardship. New Zealand citizens, permanent residents and temporary entry class visa holders are all sharing the costs in varying degrees.

When returning Kiwis finally find freedom on the other side of MIQ, what will the landscape look like?

This population of people are bringing with them advanced skills and networks obtained through their international experiences and New Zealand needs to ensure that these benefits and experiences are shared and captured to enhance the local economy.

While some will have the flexibility to work remotely for international employers, many will be seeking work within the domestic job market. They will benefit from the recently signalled employment law changes which aim to improve employees’ entitlements, increase the minimum wage and sick leave entitlements.

While a considerable number may settle in Auckland, the provinces will benefit too. The purpose of a recent survey carried out by Kiwi Expat Association (KEA) was to better understand offshore Kiwis and their intentions, such as their timeframes to return home, skills, industry experience and wealth, as well as their needs upon return.

The survey indicated that while 32% of returnees intend to reside in Auckland, the remainder are looking to return to the regions, with 22% leaning towards somewhere they may not have lived before.

The big question – what does this mean for our housing market, which is already under the spotlight given recent changes to the Residential Tenancies Act, increasing housing prices and new tax rules in the past year?

While there is continued pressure on the housing market, the effect of the legislative changes announced in March 2021 by the Labour Government are likely to flow through. These changes are intended to make the property market fairer for first home buyers and to take out some of the ‘heat’ from the market. The changes include an extension of the Bright Line Test which sees tax paid on any capital gains made if an investment property is sold within a set period. The extension of the bright-line test from five to ten years will effectively see a longer lock-in period for property investors and is intended to slow down property sales.

Another change was the removal of interest rate deductibility from investor housing. Proposed to begin in October this year, deductibility on mortgage interest will be reduced by 25% increments for existing property investments and will be fully phased out by April 2025. This policy will generate a significant amount of additional tax to be paid by property investors and will weigh on cashflows and potentially impact decision making.

While the true effect of these recent changes to is yet to be seen, returning Kiwis can be sure that the Government is focused on improving the supply of housing to the market. This is also the intention with the recent review of the Resource Management Act.

While it may not be a smooth home coming for all, many Kiwis will simply be grateful to return to a country which has been largely unaffected by a global pandemic. And for us who are already here, we should see the influx of those returning home as an opportunity for growth and connection.

AUTHOR: Christine Symes is a director at Bramwell Bate and provides advice on a range of matters including property, company and commercial, trusts and estates, and Wills and Power of Attorneys.

christine@bramwellbate.co.nz

Employers need to balance growth with volatility from COVID-19

No doubt we are all spending a lot of time considering what sort of year 2021 will be. New Zealand has been very fortunate compared to the rest of the world, however, there are still plenty of challenges we are facing particularly for those in certain industries such as tourism and events, most recently highlighted by the cancellation of the Art Deco Festival due to the recent change in alert levels.

Confidence in the local economy appears strong although it is hard to predict if this will continue and how any changes will impact the workforce and its well-being. For example, businesses may be wishing to increase their workforce to cope with current workloads while trying to balance this with not being over-committed given the potential changes to alert levels throughout the year and the resulting impact on both the local and national economy.

While we are all navigating this together, we must also be aware and informed of the employment law changes the Government has signalled for the coming 12 months. The Government has made a commitment to focus on our workers and will look to introduce changes to better support them.

These changes include:

  • a confirmed minimum wage increase effective on 1 April 2021 from $18.90 to $20.00 per
  • proposed increase to sick leave entitlements from five to ten days every 12 months which looks likely to apply to both full and part time employees, but will not increase
  • making it easier for women to gain pay
  • plans to strengthen and simplify the Holidays
  • Te Rā o Matariki confirmed as a public holiday from

Employers must be conversant with the changes already confirmed, and those that are planned, and be ready to implement them while also navigating the uncertainty from COVID-19.

  • What is clear is that working arrangements have (and no doubt will continue) to change for some For example, in the professional services sector (such as lawyers and accountants) there is a greater focus on flexible working which includes working a different number of hours, e.g. part-time.
  • working within different time frames, g. starting and finishing early.
  • working
  • job-sharing.
  • purchasing additional annual
  • taking additional unpaid annual

These flexible working arrangements are known to have benefits for employees, such as:

  • the ability to meet family needs and responsibilities.
  • reducing the chance of burnout
  • increased job satisfaction.

Under part 6AA of the Employment Relations Act 2000, all employees have the right to request a variation of their working arrangements at any time. Employers have an obligation to respond to requests as soon as possible and not later than one month after receiving the employee’s request.

There is a limited but broad number of reasons employers can decline a request for a variation to working arrangements, such as an inability to recruit additional staff or to reorganise work.

Employers should consider a number of factors when an employee requests flexible working arrangements and it is important to ensure that transparent processes are put in place for the benefit of both the employer and the employee. Employers must also be aware that no matter when or where an employee works, ensuring their health and safety is a shared responsibility. For example, if an employee will be working remotely, they are responsible for organising a work area that is appropriately set up to ensure that they can work safely, and an employer may request an employee provide photos of their work location. An employer may also request a health and safety assessment of the workstation to ensure that the employer’s health and safety obligations are being met.

Businesses will no doubt continue to adapt to the ever- changing landscape presented by COVID-19 and those that chose to embrace flexible working for their employees may end up with a stronger and more committed workforce. That said, we suspect that there will be many twists and turns to come throughout 2021.

Putting your best foot forward in a booming property market

By Anna Bernie

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a great deal of economic uncertainty both globally and in New Zealand.  During the lockdown in April and May 2020 we were all questioning how the housing market would be impacted.

Contrary to the expectations of some commentators, the NZ housing market has been booming since the end of lockdown.  Whether this is from an increase in Kiwis returning home, new home buyers taking advantage of lower interest rates or people just needing a change, the fact is competition for houses has increased and prices are still rising. According to data REINZ released in September 2020, median house prices across NZ increased by 16.4% in August 2020.  In Hawke’s Bay the increase in annual sales volumes during August was 32.5%, the highest number of house sales for the month of August in 14 years.

Bramwell Bate is finding that clients are often involved in a multi-buyer situation where now, more than ever, they are needing to put their best foot forward in order to have a chance at their offer being accepted.

It is still important, however, that you do your homework first.  A house purchase is one of the biggest investments you will likely make in your lifetime.

When you put forward an offer to purchase a property, you can make the offer subject to several conditions that need to be satisfied before your purchase proceeds.

One of the most common conditions is finance.  Even if you have pre-approval from a bank, most banks will need to see the signed Agreement for Sale and Purchase and approve the property you are looking to purchase before they will give you final approval. This makes the finance condition crucial.

If it is your first home, then you may be eligible for a Homestart Grant or to withdraw funds from your Kiwisaver.  In these situations you should speak with your lawyer about what timeframe your finance condition should have to ensure you have sufficient time to get approval and withdrawal of funds, especially if you need those funds to pay a deposit to the vendor.

A solicitor’s approval condition is also often included in an Agreement for Sale and Purchase.  This can provide your solicitor with a chance to look at the Agreement and the title to the property.  For example, there may be an easement on the property which gives someone a right of way, or a right to run power or pipelines through your property. You may also have plans to develop your property and before you proceed with the purchase it is important to consider whether any easements might restrict your ability to do so.

Another common condition is a builder’s report. This report generally allows you to obtain a report on the condition of the home and other improvements on the property.

We recommend you speak with your lawyer prior to making an offer so that you can consider the number of conditions to include and ensure that you are sufficiently protected.  There may also be instances where you can make enquiries before putting forward your offer, such as obtaining the builder’s report or asking your lawyer to take a look at the title to the property before you proceed.

Whatever you decide, it is important to get the proper advice and support.  A signed Agreement for Sale and Purchase is a legally binding document. Your lawyer will talk you through it, answer any questions, and ensure it is correct before you sign.

A timely reminder to review your affairs

As we slowly return to our day to day routines following the COVID-19 lockdown, it’s a good time to reflect on the lessons learnt from the paired back existence we experienced during these unprecedented times. One of the overwhelming messages to come out of the lockdown, was an even greater appreciation of our families and our desire to protect them.

It is at times like these, that we should take stock of our personal affairs to ensure that in the event that something happens to us, the very people we want to protect are not left behind to sort out our unfinished business. A timely reminder to review your personal affairs and ensure everything is in order. Below are some areas worthy of consideration:

Wills

Anyone over the age of 18 years should have a Will. A Will is a legal document which sets out how you want your estate to be administered upon your death. It is legally binding. Without it, your assets will be administered according to a formula set out by the law and this may not align with you or your family’s wishes.

If you have already put a Will in place, you should continue to review it and ensure it reflects your current intentions and wishes. Perhaps you have married since you last made a Will, and if so, you should check to ensure it was made in contemplation of marriage otherwise you may find that it’s invalid. Likewise, if you have recently separated or divorced, it is likely that the intentions for your estate will have changed.

Enduring Powers of Attorney (EPA)

Putting in place an EPA enables you to decide ahead of time who will make decisions for and about you if you become unable to make those decisions yourself. An EPA gives a specific person the legal power to act on your behalf if you become “mentally incapable”.

If you don’t make an EPA, and you become unable to make your own decisions, or unable to communicate your decisions to others, people close to you will need to apply to the Family Court to have the Court make various kinds of decisions about your life, or the Court may appoint someone to make those decisions for you.

You can put in place an EPA for personal care and welfare and one for your property and finances. You can have either type of EPA or both, it depends on your personal circumstances.

Memorandum of Wishes

If you have a family trust, putting in place a Memorandum of Wishes is one way that you, as the settlor, or creator of the trust,

If you have already put a Will in place, you should continue to review it and ensure it reflects your current intentions and wishes. Perhaps you have married since you last made a Will, and if so, you should check to ensure it was made in contemplation of marriage otherwise you may find that it’s

can signal to the trustees your intentions. A Memorandum of Wishes is read alongside the trust deed and trustees should have regard to the Memorandum of Wishes in the exercise of their discretionary powers in dealing with the trust assets and making distributions.

Lease Renewals

The compulsory shutdown of many businesses over the lockdown saw a number of leases being considered in greater detail. It is important that you review your lease documents
to ensure that you have current arrangements in place. If
the renewal or review dates have passed and the lease arrangement remains in place, it is likely it will be on a month by month basis with either party having the ability to terminate the lease with one month’s notice. This situation does not provide a great deal of financial certainty moving forward.

More compliance for Trusts

In my last article, I summarised some of the key changes to Trust Law arising from the Trusts Act 2019, which comes into force on 30 January 2021. One of the key changes.

The Act aims to make trusts more accessible and to strengthen the ability of beneficiaries to hold trustees to account. In doing this, the Act increases compliance requirements for trustees, which will likely increase the costs to operate and maintain a trust, and increases risks associated with being a trustee of a trust.

Requirement to keep core trust documents

As mentioned in my previous article, Trustees are required to keep core trust documents necessary for the administration of the trust.

Keeping the core trust documents together is clearly prudent and sensible, however at present the documents may not all be held together (e.g. some with trustees and some with advisers, lawyers and accountants). It is permissible for one trustee to hold most of the documents but each trustee must hold the trust deed and any variation of those terms. Where one trustee is to hold most of the documents, they will need to be held in a manner to allow the other trustees to access them easily.

Disclosure of information to beneficiaries

The Act creates a presumption that a trustee must make ‘basic trust information’ available to every beneficiary and ‘trust information’ available to beneficiaries who request it.

Before any information is provided the trustees must consider a range of factors and may choose to withhold the information if the trustees “reasonably consider” that the information should not be disclosed.

In either scenario (disclosure of information or non- disclosure) there will be ongoing requirements to update information previously provided and to review a decision to withhold disclosure of the information.

Review of Trustee decisions

A beneficiary will be able to apply to the court to review “the act, omission or decision” of a trustee “on the ground that the act, omission, or decision was not or is not reasonably open to the trustee in the circumstances.”

We will have to wait to see how this will work in practice, however we may see beneficiaries challenging trustee decisions more frequently particularly in circumstances that could be considered “contentious”.

What I suspect may occur is that trustees will seek professional advice more frequently for decisions for which they would not have previously done so. By way of an example, a trustee may now seek advice from a financial adviser on how to invest funds from the sale of property rather than placing the funds with the trust’s bank as they have done previously – where a court is considering whether a trustee is liable for a breach of the duty “to invest prudently to the applicable standard” the court can consider if the “trust investments have been diversified, so far as is appropriate to the circumstances of the trust” and whether “the investment was made in accordance with any investment strategy”.

Exemption and Liability Clauses

Following on from the increased compliance, is the inability for a trust deed (both new and existing) under the new Act to limit a trustee’s liability for breach of trust arising from dishonesty, willful misconduct or gross negligence (rather than ‘ordinary’ negligence), and does not allow a trustee to be indemnified out of trust property for such breaches. This means that trustees can no longer rely on broad indemnity clauses that purport to protect them against gross negligence.

You may consider that this is fair and reasonable, however when determining if a trustee has been grossly negligent, the Courts will consider:

The circumstances, nature and seriousness of the breach;

The trustee’s knowledge and intention relating to the breach;

The trustee’s knowledge and skills and whether the trustee has been paid;

The purpose for which the trustee was appointed;

The type of trust, including the degree to which the trust is part of a commercial arrangement, the assets held by the trust, how the assets are used, and how the trust operates.

While the threshold for gross negligence has been set very high, these changes may result in a trustee’s exposure to liability increasing which some trustees may not wish to carry.

Where professional persons, such as lawyers and accountants, are still happy to act as trustees, we will expect that they will become more involved in the day-to-day affairs of the trust.

We hope that the above gives an idea of how working with trusts may change and importantly how it could mean that the increase in the time and cost of administering some trusts, will result in some trusts no longer being cost-effective.

New Trust Act – are you prepared?

On 30 July 2019, the Trust Act 2019 received Royal Assent signalling a modernisation of trust legislation that, given the number of trusts in New Zealand, we should all be aware of.

The new Act will replace the Trustee Act 1956 and its purpose is to make the law more accessible to both trustees and beneficiaries of trusts.

Significantly the new Act does not come into force until 30 January 2021 – given the extent of the changes, the new Act provides for an 18-month lead in. While this is a substantial period, time will pass quickly and the new Act will be in force before we know it.

The new Act will apply to existing and new trusts, and therefore we recommend that all existing trusts are reviewed in light of the changes and in some cases varied or wound up.

Some of the key changes being introduced by the new Act are:

Trustee Duties

The new Act identifies and defines mandatory and default duties of trustees.

The five mandatory duties that cannot be avoided or excluded in the trust deed are:

  • a duty to know the terms of the trust,
  • a duty to act in accordance with thoseterms,
  • a duty to act honestly and in good faith,
  • a duty to act for the benefit of beneficiaries, and
  • a duty to exercise the trustee’s powers for proper purposes.The ten default duties are not compulsory but will apply unless they are expressly excluded in the trust deed. The default duties are:
  • Exercise reasonable skill and care in administering the trust, having regard to any special knowledge or expertise that the trustee has, or to any special business or professional knowledge or expertise if the trustee is acting in the course of a business or profession;
  • Invest prudently, with the same regard to special knowledge or experience as above;

• Not exercise their power for their own benefit, whether directly or indirectly;

• Regularly and actively consider whether they should be exercising their powers;

• Not bind or commit trustees to the future exercise or non-exercise of their powers;

• Avoid conflicts of interest;

• Act impartially between beneficiaries;

• Not profit financially from being a trustee;

• Not take any reward for being a trustee; and

• Act unanimously with the other trustees. Trust Duration

The length of a Trust’s life has been extended from a maximum of 80 years to a maximum of 125 years.

Duty to hold documents

The new Act requires trustees to retain core documents, so far as it is reasonable. Where there is more than one trustee, each trustee must hold:

The trust deed and any other document that contains terms of the trust;

Any variations made to the trust terms;

And they must be satisfied that at least 1 of the trustees holds the other required documents and that they will be made available to the other trustees on request. The other core documents are:

• Records of trust property identifying the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the trust;

• Records of trustee decisions made during the trustee’s trusteeship;

• Written contracts entered into during that trustee’s trusteeship;

• Accounting records and financial statements prepared during that trustee’s trusteeship;

• Documents of appointment, removal, and discharge of trustees;

• Any letter or memorandum of wishes from the settlor;

• Any other documents necessary for the administration of the trust;

• Any of the above documents that were kept by a former trustee and passed on to the current trustee.

Disclosure Obligations

The new Act favours keeping beneficiaries informed and clearly outlines the basic trust information that is to be provided to every beneficiary, namely:

• that they are a beneficiary;
• the name and contact details of the

trustees;

• changes to the trustees as they occur; and

• the right of the beneficiary to request a copy of the terms of the trust or trust information.

Trustees may only refuse to provide information to beneficiaries after considering both their general obligation to provide information and a series of factors as to the nature of the information and the practicalities of restricting that information.

The implications of this are clear, particularly in circumstances where it has always been considered appropriate for a person’s interest in a trust not to be disclosed to them.

These are only some of the changes however in general terms, the new Act, increases the rights and protections for beneficiaries while also imposing more responsibility and prescriptive requirements on the trustees. The changes are likely to make trusts more transparent for beneficiaries but also more intensive to administer for trustees and could lead to changes both to trust documentation and administration.

If you are a trustee of a trust, then we recommend that you speak to the trust’s lawyer in the coming months to consider the changes as they relate to the trust in question.

Expanding your business? Proceed carefully …

It’s great to see Hawke’s Bay’s economy steaming ahead and to notice lots of positive signs that our business environment is thriving.As your business improves and demand increases you may be thinking about expanding by hiring new staff.

Before you start making offers however there have been a number of changes to employment law recently that you need to be aware of.

Change to 90 day trial period

The most important change if you’re thinking of new hires is to the 90 day trial period. From 6 May 2019 businesses that have 20 or more employees are no longer able to include a 90 day trial period in their employment agreements.

This means that if you are a larger business and employ 20 or more employees then you will no longer have a “get out of jail free card” for dismissing new employees that aren’t working out. You will need to revisit your employment agreements to remove trial period provisions. I recommend that you include comprehensive probationary period provisions instead – these would still allow you to dismiss an employee at the end of a probationary period provided that you follow a fair process and have a fair reason for dismissal. Unlike the 90 day trial period provisions however your employee will be entitled to bring a personal grievance if you haven’t followed due process.

If your number of employees fluctuates around the 20 mark then you will need to ensure that you are aware of exactly how many employees you have as at the date an employment contract including trial provisions is signed. If the business employs 20 or more employees at that date then you will not be able to utilise the trial period provisions if you later decide it is necessary to dismiss your new employee.

Smaller business can still use trial periods
Smaller businesses with less than 20 employees can continue to use trial periods, but you should be aware that any flaw in either the wording of the provision or in the way the contract was signed will mean that you can’t rely on the trial period when dismissing an employee. For a trial provision to be valid the employee must have had a chance to review and seek advice regarding their employment agreement before signing it, and the agreement must be signed prior to the first day of employment.

Be careful if you’re considering dismissal of an employee
I recommend that any employer considering terminating a worker’s employment using a 90 day trial provision, or in fact dismissing an employee for any reason, seek legal advice before doing so, as you may not be entitled to do so if you have not followed the right process, no matter how obvious it might seem to you that a dismissal is justified. Mistakes in process can be costly, so it is better to make sure you get it right.

Other changes to employment law

Along with the changes to the trial period there have also been a raft of other changes introduced, some of which took effect from December 2018, and the rest of which will be effective from 6 May 2019. These include changes to union access and collective bargaining processes and a greater emphasis on reinstatement if employees have been unfairly dismissed. The protections around restructuring for vulnerable workers have been expanded so that employers with less than 20 employees are no longer exempt.

Rest and meal breaks

Another change is to employees’ rights to set rest and meal breaks. Currently employees are simply entitled to ‘reasonable breaks’ and there are no specific rules for when or how long such breaks should be. The new law sets out the number and duration of breaks which employees are entitled to in relation to how many hours they have worked. This is actually a roll back to the pre-2015 position so many employers and employees won’t notice a significant difference if they hadn’t made any changes to breaks since then. I recommend that employment agreements include specific rest and meal break times that suit your business, as if this isn’t agreed then the default timing for breaks will apply.

Review your employment agreements
The changes I’ve mentioned are not an exhaustive list of the amendments to the Employment Relations Act. This article is only intended to give a general overview and alert you to the fact there have been changes. I recommend that all employers regularly review their employment agreements and better yet that you seek legal advice to make sure that your agreements are fit for purpose and fully comply with current legislation.

 

Business Ownership — preparing your exit strategy

It is common that an aspect of a business owner’s retirement plan is to sell the business and to use the proceeds to fund their retirement. It is important that thought and planning be given to the “exit strategy” so that when it comes time to sell the business, it is in the best shape.

This is particularly important in instances where “you” are the business and there is a question as to whether the business can continue without you and therefore what value there is in the business if you are not involved.

Business owners are often unaware of the time that it can take to prepare a business for sale. The process is often complex and will require assistance from specialists. For example, the way that you have operated the accounts of the business may well have be set up to suit your personal circumstances, but does it show an accurate picture of the performance of the business and if not, what can be done to ensure that a prospective purchaser can see the true value in the business.

Considerations

Depending on the nature of the transaction – sale to a third party or a transfer to a family member, there may be different considerations. Some matters you should consider in all transactions are:

  • How to maximise value;
  • Reliance on a customer;
  • Managing customer expectations;
  • Availability of premises;
  • Maintaining support of employees; • Taxation.In a family context, there will be other considerations:
  • management succession – is the younger generation ready to take over and do they have the skills and commitment to run the business;
  • estate planning;
  • maintaining family unity.

Maximising value

Clearly it is vital to be able to maximise the value of your business so that you can achieve the best possible price. This brings in various elements as a business’s value can be dependent on several factors.

Of primary importance, is understanding what your business is potentially worth. Most business owners will not know what their business is worth or how they can improve this.

If “you” are the business, then special consideration will need to be given as to the business’s worth (both with and without you) and how to maintain its value despite your exit from the business. For example, you may need to bring in a “successor” to work with you first before handing over the reins.

Reliance on a customer and managing customer expectations
If most of your income comes from one customer (or a small number) then it goes without saying that maintaining these customer relationships is crucial to the ongoing success of the business.

How you deal with your customers will inevitably depend on the nature of your business, however when considering your “exit strategy” you will need to consider the contractual arrangements you have in place and if the sale of the business provides them with an opportunity to terminate the contract.

I also note that, for small businesses, there may not be a contract at all. While this may currently work, you will need to consider this from the perspective of a buyer as the ability for a main customer to simply walk away may impact on what they believe that the business is worth.

It will also be important to consider how much you wish to be involved – a new purchaser may want you to be involved for a period to ensure the effective transfer of control and to help maintain customer relationships. You will need to consider this from your personal perspective as well as from the new owners (is there value in you staying involved) and from the customers.

Premises and employees

Both of these are likely to be crucial to the ongoing success of the business and if you lease your business premises then it will be important to ensure that it is available to a new owner for a reasonable amount of time as, again, the value they may attach to the

business may reduce if there is a risk that they will need to find new premises not long after purchase.

Key employees will need to be considered early in the process and possibly be included in the discussions with the prospective purchaser.

Communication

Communication is key throughout this process – deciding who to work with on your exit strategy and choosing when and how to discuss with your employees and customers. Poor communication could result in customers and/or employees leaving the business, which may in turn impact on its value.

Be prepared to adapt

The hardest part will be creating a plan. The challenge is to ensure that the plan remains effective and does not become outdated – you need to be prepared to adapt your plans.

An outdated and ineffective plan may cause as many difficulties as no plan at all.

Seek Advice Early

It is hoped that the above has provoked thought and will encourage action, however I want to highlight the importance of seeking advice from your professional advisors early in the process. The key is careful, well informed consideration of all the issues, and effective and early communication with your professional advisers will help achieve this.

Franchising – what’s in the fine print?

Despite being prevalent throughout New Zealand, there is no legislation that governs or regulates franchises, with the result that there is no requirement for the terms of a franchise to be fair and reasonable.

What is a Franchise?

Every franchise should be a replica of the Franchisor’s business, therefore giving customers of the franchise a consistent experience.

The Franchisee gains the benefit of the franchise’s reputation, goodwill and intellectual property instead of having to develop this from scratch.  A franchise business will often cost more to purchase than an equivalent independent business – the theory is that a Franchisee pays a higher up-front fee and pays on-going costs, in exchange for lower economic risk.

In general, a franchise involves:

  • A Franchisor
    • granting a Franchisee the rights to use its intellectual property and systems;
    • providing training, know-how, ongoing marketing, business or technical assistance.
  • A Franchisee
    • establishing and operating a business selling the Franchisor’s products or services;
    • being required to follow the Franchisor’s systems, procedures and instructions;
    • paying fees (royalties) to the Franchisor;

Franchise Agreement

The Franchise Agreement regulates the business operation and the franchise relationship.  The relationship is contractual and encompasses multiple areas of law such as taxation and intellectual property.

Franchise Agreements are invariably long and complex documents that favour the Franchisor and, to protect the integrity of the franchise, Franchisees will not be able to negotiate changes to it.   Some say that all Franchise Agreements are unfair, unreasonable and one-sided when considering the balance of rights and obligations – an easily missed word or clause can have a significant ongoing impact through the term of the franchise.

It therefore follows that extra care and attention must be given prior to entering into a franchise.

It is important to separate out the “sales pitch” from the nitty gritty of the Franchise Agreement.  The “sales pitch” will focus on the benefits etc. however the benefits are only one aspect of the arrangement – what is most important is understanding what it really means to be part of the franchise which can only be uncovered by considering the Franchise Agreement in detail.

During due diligence a prospective Franchisee should obtain focussed advice on the terms and implications of the Franchise Agreement.  If you are not fully informed as to the details or you do not appreciate the significance of a provision then you may be disappointed, disheartened and ultimately suffer losses as a consequence.

Fees, Levies or Royalty Payments

As part of the franchise arrangement, the Franchisee would typically be required to pay a number of fees:

  • An initial (lump sum) franchise fee to compensate the Franchisor for development costs and as a licence fee;
  • On-going service or royalty payments for the on-going:
    • use of the system and trade name;
    • support and assistance of the Franchisor.
  • An advertising or marketing levy (an advantage of the system is that a Franchisee obtains the benefit of the franchise’s advertising albeit that the Franchisor chooses how to advertise or market the franchise).

Other terms to consider

  1. The length of the initial term;
  2. If and how the franchise can be renewed and the fees associated with a renewal;
  3. The territory in which the franchise will operate and any rights to exclusivity in that territory;
  4. How the franchise can be terminated and obligations on termination; and
  5. Restraint of trade.

Franchise Association of New Zealand

While there is no government regulatory body for franchises, the Franchise Association of New Zealand (FANZ) is involved throughout the country and sets standards for best practice among its members.

Franchisors that are members of FANZ are required to follow its Code of Practice, which should reassure potential Franchisees that the Franchisor is serious and has undertaken to practise in a fair and reasonable manner.

By way of an example, FANZ requires its members to:

  • publish a disclosure document to maximise the information available to prospective Franchisees, so that they can make a sound business decision whether or not to proceed
  • insist that each Franchisee has independent legal and accounting advice
  • use agreements that contain a minimum of a 7-day cooling off period.

 

Co-ownership agreements

You should always protect your investments as best you can and your entry into a new business venture is no different.

Any new business always starts with good intentions and hope for a positive outcome. However, no matter how strong the bond between you and your business partner(s), every relationship goes through its ups and downs and you should try to agree on the fundamentals of your current and ongoing business relationship, in case the relationship breaks down.

Types of Agreement

These can come in any number of forms such as a Shareholders’ Agreement (for limited liability companies), a Partnership Agreement or a Joint Venture Agreement.

Given that most businesses operate as limited liability companies, Shareholders’ Agreements are most commonly seen. We will therefore, for ease, focus on these – albeit that the matters that can or should be covered in a Shareholders’ Agreement are relevant to other forms of Co-Ownership Agreements.

What is a Shareholders’ Agreement?

Ultimately it is a private agreement between the shareholders as to how they will run the company although it is a very flexible document and can be used to cover any matters that the shareholders wish.

Without a Shareholders’ Agreement, the shareholders might not have a say over company matters if the directors (and company itself) are complying with the Companies Act and the Company’s Constitution (if it has one).

As mentioned above a key aspect of a Shareholders’ Agreement is that it is a private document, between the Shareholders and the Company, and not available to be viewed by others, unlike the Company’s Constitution, which is a public document and registered on the Companies Office website.

While it is preferable for a Shareholders’ Agreement to be signed on or before the incorporation of a company it can be entered into at any time.

Why should you have a Shareholders’ Agreement

Some benefits of having a Shareholder’s Agreement include:

• dealing with matters decided prior to incorporation unlike the constitution, which will only take effect from date of incorporation;

• removing misconceptions as to the scope and purpose of the business;

• detailing provisions which require unanimity to be altered – a constitution can be changed by 75% of the shareholders and therefore could be changed without the agreement of a minority shareholder.

What should be included in the Shareholders’ Agreement?

A Shareholders’ Agreement is flexible and can include anything that the Shareholders consider relevant. There are common topics, which we would recommend are considered for inclusion, as follows:

1. The purpose of the business and how it will be run by the shareholders;

2. The number of directors and who has the right to appoint or remove them;

3. The roles and responsibilities of the shareholders;

4. What decisions require shareholder approval (and the level of said approval e.g. unanimous);

5. How funding will be arranged and secured (including shareholder loans);

6. How shares can be transferred or sold – e.g. pre-emptive rights;

7. How shares are to be valued and if the valuation alters depending on the circumstances;

8. How and under what circumstances can a shareholder or director be removed;

9. Restraint of trade and non-competition provisions

10. Dividend policy;

11. Dispute Resolution and Deadlock provisions – i.e. what happens when shareholders cannot agree or a dispute cannot be resolved.

Areas of common contention relate to how a shareholder can exit the company and resolving disputes.

Exit Strategy

We would recommend that focus be given to this issue as it is important for a shareholder to understand (prior to entering the company) when and how they may be able to exit the company and on what terms.

By way of an example an agreement can outline a minimum amount of time that a shareholder must remain part of the company and the exit process itself (e.g. notice requirements and share valuations).

Disputes and deadlocks

While shareholders might hope to always be able to reach an agreement with each other, disputes are common. If there is no Shareholders’ Agreement the process of resolving such disputes can be messy, expensive and extremely disruptive to the day-to-day operation of the company.

Deadlocks occur when shareholders holding equal voting rights are unable to agree. In such circumstances it is important to set out how such a deadlock will be resolved to ensure that the company can quickly move forward.

Negotiation of agreement

The act of negotiating a Shareholders’ Agreement (or other form of co-ownership agreement) is an important and useful process to undertake with your prospective shareholders/business partners as you will need to discuss and try to agree on what will happen if a certain event arises.

This will assist in the process of getting to know each other and ultimately will help establish that you can actually work together.